aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'test')
-rw-r--r--test/pleroma/config/deprecation_warnings_test.exs177
-rw-r--r--test/pleroma/user_test.exs2
-rw-r--r--test/pleroma/web/activity_pub/mrf/simple_policy_test.exs65
-rw-r--r--test/pleroma/web/activity_pub/mrf_test.exs9
-rw-r--r--test/pleroma/web/activity_pub/publisher_test.exs74
-rw-r--r--test/pleroma/web/node_info_test.exs136
-rw-r--r--test/support/factory.ex32
7 files changed, 441 insertions, 54 deletions
diff --git a/test/pleroma/config/deprecation_warnings_test.exs b/test/pleroma/config/deprecation_warnings_test.exs
index f52629f8a..2a674d7bf 100644
--- a/test/pleroma/config/deprecation_warnings_test.exs
+++ b/test/pleroma/config/deprecation_warnings_test.exs
@@ -11,6 +11,183 @@ defmodule Pleroma.Config.DeprecationWarningsTest do
alias Pleroma.Config
alias Pleroma.Config.DeprecationWarnings
+ describe "simple policy tuples" do
+ test "gives warning when there are still strings" do
+ clear_config([:mrf_simple],
+ media_removal: ["some.removal"],
+ media_nsfw: ["some.nsfw"],
+ federated_timeline_removal: ["some.tl.removal"],
+ report_removal: ["some.report.removal"],
+ reject: ["some.reject"],
+ followers_only: ["some.followers.only"],
+ accept: ["some.accept"],
+ avatar_removal: ["some.avatar.removal"],
+ banner_removal: ["some.banner.removal"],
+ reject_deletes: ["some.reject.deletes"]
+ )
+
+ assert capture_log(fn -> DeprecationWarnings.check_simple_policy_tuples() end) =~
+ """
+ !!!DEPRECATION WARNING!!!
+ Your config is using strings in the SimplePolicy configuration instead of tuples. They should work for now, but you are advised to change to the new configuration to prevent possible issues later:
+
+ ```
+ config :pleroma, :mrf_simple,
+ media_removal: ["instance.tld"],
+ media_nsfw: ["instance.tld"],
+ federated_timeline_removal: ["instance.tld"],
+ report_removal: ["instance.tld"],
+ reject: ["instance.tld"],
+ followers_only: ["instance.tld"],
+ accept: ["instance.tld"],
+ avatar_removal: ["instance.tld"],
+ banner_removal: ["instance.tld"],
+ reject_deletes: ["instance.tld"]
+ ```
+
+ Is now
+
+
+ ```
+ config :pleroma, :mrf_simple,
+ media_removal: [{"instance.tld", "Reason for media removal"}],
+ media_nsfw: [{"instance.tld", "Reason for media nsfw"}],
+ federated_timeline_removal: [{"instance.tld", "Reason for federated timeline removal"}],
+ report_removal: [{"instance.tld", "Reason for report removal"}],
+ reject: [{"instance.tld", "Reason for reject"}],
+ followers_only: [{"instance.tld", "Reason for followers only"}],
+ accept: [{"instance.tld", "Reason for accept"}],
+ avatar_removal: [{"instance.tld", "Reason for avatar removal"}],
+ banner_removal: [{"instance.tld", "Reason for banner removal"}],
+ reject_deletes: [{"instance.tld", "Reason for reject deletes"}]
+ ```
+ """
+ end
+
+ test "transforms config to tuples" do
+ clear_config([:mrf_simple],
+ media_removal: ["some.removal", {"some.other.instance", "Some reason"}]
+ )
+
+ expected_config = [
+ {:media_removal, [{"some.removal", ""}, {"some.other.instance", "Some reason"}]}
+ ]
+
+ capture_log(fn -> DeprecationWarnings.warn() end)
+
+ assert Config.get([:mrf_simple]) == expected_config
+ end
+
+ test "doesn't give a warning with correct config" do
+ clear_config([:mrf_simple],
+ media_removal: [{"some.removal", ""}, {"some.other.instance", "Some reason"}]
+ )
+
+ assert capture_log(fn -> DeprecationWarnings.check_simple_policy_tuples() end) == ""
+ end
+ end
+
+ describe "quarantined_instances tuples" do
+ test "gives warning when there are still strings" do
+ clear_config([:instance, :quarantined_instances], [
+ {"domain.com", "some reason"},
+ "somedomain.tld"
+ ])
+
+ assert capture_log(fn -> DeprecationWarnings.check_quarantined_instances_tuples() end) =~
+ """
+ !!!DEPRECATION WARNING!!!
+ Your config is using strings in the quarantined_instances configuration instead of tuples. They should work for now, but you are advised to change to the new configuration to prevent possible issues later:
+
+ ```
+ config :pleroma, :instance,
+ quarantined_instances: ["instance.tld"]
+ ```
+
+ Is now
+
+
+ ```
+ config :pleroma, :instance,
+ quarantined_instances: [{"instance.tld", "Reason for quarantine"}]
+ ```
+ """
+ end
+
+ test "transforms config to tuples" do
+ clear_config([:instance, :quarantined_instances], [
+ {"domain.com", "some reason"},
+ "some.tld"
+ ])
+
+ expected_config = [{"domain.com", "some reason"}, {"some.tld", ""}]
+
+ capture_log(fn -> DeprecationWarnings.warn() end)
+
+ assert Config.get([:instance, :quarantined_instances]) == expected_config
+ end
+
+ test "doesn't give a warning with correct config" do
+ clear_config([:instance, :quarantined_instances], [
+ {"domain.com", "some reason"},
+ {"some.tld", ""}
+ ])
+
+ assert capture_log(fn -> DeprecationWarnings.check_quarantined_instances_tuples() end) == ""
+ end
+ end
+
+ describe "transparency_exclusions tuples" do
+ test "gives warning when there are still strings" do
+ clear_config([:mrf, :transparency_exclusions], [
+ {"domain.com", "some reason"},
+ "somedomain.tld"
+ ])
+
+ assert capture_log(fn -> DeprecationWarnings.check_transparency_exclusions_tuples() end) =~
+ """
+ !!!DEPRECATION WARNING!!!
+ Your config is using strings in the transparency_exclusions configuration instead of tuples. They should work for now, but you are advised to change to the new configuration to prevent possible issues later:
+
+ ```
+ config :pleroma, :mrf,
+ transparency_exclusions: ["instance.tld"]
+ ```
+
+ Is now
+
+
+ ```
+ config :pleroma, :mrf,
+ transparency_exclusions: [{"instance.tld", "Reason to exlude transparency"}]
+ ```
+ """
+ end
+
+ test "transforms config to tuples" do
+ clear_config([:mrf, :transparency_exclusions], [
+ {"domain.com", "some reason"},
+ "some.tld"
+ ])
+
+ expected_config = [{"domain.com", "some reason"}, {"some.tld", ""}]
+
+ capture_log(fn -> DeprecationWarnings.warn() end)
+
+ assert Config.get([:mrf, :transparency_exclusions]) == expected_config
+ end
+
+ test "doesn't give a warning with correct config" do
+ clear_config([:mrf, :transparency_exclusions], [
+ {"domain.com", "some reason"},
+ {"some.tld", ""}
+ ])
+
+ assert capture_log(fn -> DeprecationWarnings.check_transparency_exclusions_tuples() end) ==
+ ""
+ end
+ end
+
test "check_old_mrf_config/0" do
clear_config([:instance, :rewrite_policy], [])
clear_config([:instance, :mrf_transparency], true)
diff --git a/test/pleroma/user_test.exs b/test/pleroma/user_test.exs
index f0f5d6071..60741d255 100644
--- a/test/pleroma/user_test.exs
+++ b/test/pleroma/user_test.exs
@@ -480,7 +480,7 @@ defmodule Pleroma.UserTest do
)
test "it sends a welcome chat message when Simple policy applied to local instance" do
- Pleroma.Config.put([:mrf_simple, :media_nsfw], ["localhost"])
+ Pleroma.Config.put([:mrf_simple, :media_nsfw], [{"localhost", ""}])
welcome_user = insert(:user)
Pleroma.Config.put([:welcome, :chat_message, :enabled], true)
diff --git a/test/pleroma/web/activity_pub/mrf/simple_policy_test.exs b/test/pleroma/web/activity_pub/mrf/simple_policy_test.exs
index d7dde62c4..3e9da13b5 100644
--- a/test/pleroma/web/activity_pub/mrf/simple_policy_test.exs
+++ b/test/pleroma/web/activity_pub/mrf/simple_policy_test.exs
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ defmodule Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF.SimplePolicyTest do
end
test "has a matching host" do
- Config.put([:mrf_simple, :media_removal], ["remote.instance"])
+ Config.put([:mrf_simple, :media_removal], [{"remote.instance", "Some reason"}])
media_message = build_media_message()
local_message = build_local_message()
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ defmodule Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF.SimplePolicyTest do
end
test "match with wildcard domain" do
- Config.put([:mrf_simple, :media_removal], ["*.remote.instance"])
+ Config.put([:mrf_simple, :media_removal], [{"*.remote.instance", "Whatever reason"}])
media_message = build_media_message()
local_message = build_local_message()
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ defmodule Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF.SimplePolicyTest do
end
test "has a matching host" do
- Config.put([:mrf_simple, :media_nsfw], ["remote.instance"])
+ Config.put([:mrf_simple, :media_nsfw], [{"remote.instance", "Whetever"}])
media_message = build_media_message()
local_message = build_local_message()
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ defmodule Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF.SimplePolicyTest do
end
test "match with wildcard domain" do
- Config.put([:mrf_simple, :media_nsfw], ["*.remote.instance"])
+ Config.put([:mrf_simple, :media_nsfw], [{"*.remote.instance", "yeah yeah"}])
media_message = build_media_message()
local_message = build_local_message()
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ defmodule Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF.SimplePolicyTest do
end
test "has a matching host" do
- Config.put([:mrf_simple, :report_removal], ["remote.instance"])
+ Config.put([:mrf_simple, :report_removal], [{"remote.instance", "muh"}])
report_message = build_report_message()
local_message = build_local_message()
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ defmodule Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF.SimplePolicyTest do
end
test "match with wildcard domain" do
- Config.put([:mrf_simple, :report_removal], ["*.remote.instance"])
+ Config.put([:mrf_simple, :report_removal], [{"*.remote.instance", "suya"}])
report_message = build_report_message()
local_message = build_local_message()
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ defmodule Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF.SimplePolicyTest do
|> URI.parse()
|> Map.fetch!(:host)
- Config.put([:mrf_simple, :federated_timeline_removal], [ftl_message_actor_host])
+ Config.put([:mrf_simple, :federated_timeline_removal], [{ftl_message_actor_host, "uwu"}])
local_message = build_local_message()
assert {:ok, ftl_message} = SimplePolicy.filter(ftl_message)
@@ -187,7 +187,10 @@ defmodule Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF.SimplePolicyTest do
|> URI.parse()
|> Map.fetch!(:host)
- Config.put([:mrf_simple, :federated_timeline_removal], ["*." <> ftl_message_actor_host])
+ Config.put([:mrf_simple, :federated_timeline_removal], [
+ {"*." <> ftl_message_actor_host, "owo"}
+ ])
+
local_message = build_local_message()
assert {:ok, ftl_message} = SimplePolicy.filter(ftl_message)
@@ -210,7 +213,9 @@ defmodule Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF.SimplePolicyTest do
ftl_message = Map.put(ftl_message, "cc", [])
- Config.put([:mrf_simple, :federated_timeline_removal], [ftl_message_actor_host])
+ Config.put([:mrf_simple, :federated_timeline_removal], [
+ {ftl_message_actor_host, "spiderwaifu goes 88w88"}
+ ])
assert {:ok, ftl_message} = SimplePolicy.filter(ftl_message)
refute "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public" in ftl_message["to"]
@@ -239,7 +244,7 @@ defmodule Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF.SimplePolicyTest do
end
test "activity has a matching host" do
- Config.put([:mrf_simple, :reject], ["remote.instance"])
+ Config.put([:mrf_simple, :reject], [{"remote.instance", ""}])
remote_message = build_remote_message()
@@ -247,7 +252,7 @@ defmodule Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF.SimplePolicyTest do
end
test "activity matches with wildcard domain" do
- Config.put([:mrf_simple, :reject], ["*.remote.instance"])
+ Config.put([:mrf_simple, :reject], [{"*.remote.instance", ""}])
remote_message = build_remote_message()
@@ -255,7 +260,7 @@ defmodule Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF.SimplePolicyTest do
end
test "actor has a matching host" do
- Config.put([:mrf_simple, :reject], ["remote.instance"])
+ Config.put([:mrf_simple, :reject], [{"remote.instance", ""}])
remote_user = build_remote_user()
@@ -305,7 +310,7 @@ defmodule Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF.SimplePolicyTest do
|> URI.parse()
|> Map.fetch!(:host)
- Config.put([:mrf_simple, :followers_only], [actor_domain])
+ Config.put([:mrf_simple, :followers_only], [{actor_domain, ""}])
assert {:ok, new_activity} = SimplePolicy.filter(activity)
assert actor.follower_address in new_activity["cc"]
@@ -333,7 +338,7 @@ defmodule Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF.SimplePolicyTest do
end
test "is not empty but activity doesn't have a matching host" do
- Config.put([:mrf_simple, :accept], ["non.matching.remote"])
+ Config.put([:mrf_simple, :accept], [{"non.matching.remote", ""}])
local_message = build_local_message()
remote_message = build_remote_message()
@@ -343,7 +348,7 @@ defmodule Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF.SimplePolicyTest do
end
test "activity has a matching host" do
- Config.put([:mrf_simple, :accept], ["remote.instance"])
+ Config.put([:mrf_simple, :accept], [{"remote.instance", ""}])
local_message = build_local_message()
remote_message = build_remote_message()
@@ -353,7 +358,7 @@ defmodule Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF.SimplePolicyTest do
end
test "activity matches with wildcard domain" do
- Config.put([:mrf_simple, :accept], ["*.remote.instance"])
+ Config.put([:mrf_simple, :accept], [{"*.remote.instance", ""}])
local_message = build_local_message()
remote_message = build_remote_message()
@@ -363,7 +368,7 @@ defmodule Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF.SimplePolicyTest do
end
test "actor has a matching host" do
- Config.put([:mrf_simple, :accept], ["remote.instance"])
+ Config.put([:mrf_simple, :accept], [{"remote.instance", ""}])
remote_user = build_remote_user()
@@ -381,7 +386,7 @@ defmodule Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF.SimplePolicyTest do
end
test "is not empty but it doesn't have a matching host" do
- Config.put([:mrf_simple, :avatar_removal], ["non.matching.remote"])
+ Config.put([:mrf_simple, :avatar_removal], [{"non.matching.remote", ""}])
remote_user = build_remote_user()
@@ -389,7 +394,7 @@ defmodule Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF.SimplePolicyTest do
end
test "has a matching host" do
- Config.put([:mrf_simple, :avatar_removal], ["remote.instance"])
+ Config.put([:mrf_simple, :avatar_removal], [{"remote.instance", ""}])
remote_user = build_remote_user()
{:ok, filtered} = SimplePolicy.filter(remote_user)
@@ -398,7 +403,7 @@ defmodule Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF.SimplePolicyTest do
end
test "match with wildcard domain" do
- Config.put([:mrf_simple, :avatar_removal], ["*.remote.instance"])
+ Config.put([:mrf_simple, :avatar_removal], [{"*.remote.instance", ""}])
remote_user = build_remote_user()
{:ok, filtered} = SimplePolicy.filter(remote_user)
@@ -417,7 +422,7 @@ defmodule Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF.SimplePolicyTest do
end
test "is not empty but it doesn't have a matching host" do
- Config.put([:mrf_simple, :banner_removal], ["non.matching.remote"])
+ Config.put([:mrf_simple, :banner_removal], [{"non.matching.remote", ""}])
remote_user = build_remote_user()
@@ -425,7 +430,7 @@ defmodule Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF.SimplePolicyTest do
end
test "has a matching host" do
- Config.put([:mrf_simple, :banner_removal], ["remote.instance"])
+ Config.put([:mrf_simple, :banner_removal], [{"remote.instance", ""}])
remote_user = build_remote_user()
{:ok, filtered} = SimplePolicy.filter(remote_user)
@@ -434,7 +439,7 @@ defmodule Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF.SimplePolicyTest do
end
test "match with wildcard domain" do
- Config.put([:mrf_simple, :banner_removal], ["*.remote.instance"])
+ Config.put([:mrf_simple, :banner_removal], [{"*.remote.instance", ""}])
remote_user = build_remote_user()
{:ok, filtered} = SimplePolicy.filter(remote_user)
@@ -447,7 +452,7 @@ defmodule Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF.SimplePolicyTest do
setup do: Config.put([:mrf_simple, :reject_deletes], [])
test "it accepts deletions even from rejected servers" do
- Config.put([:mrf_simple, :reject], ["remote.instance"])
+ Config.put([:mrf_simple, :reject], [{"remote.instance", ""}])
deletion_message = build_remote_deletion_message()
@@ -455,7 +460,7 @@ defmodule Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF.SimplePolicyTest do
end
test "it accepts deletions even from non-whitelisted servers" do
- Config.put([:mrf_simple, :accept], ["non.matching.remote"])
+ Config.put([:mrf_simple, :accept], [{"non.matching.remote", ""}])
deletion_message = build_remote_deletion_message()
@@ -464,10 +469,10 @@ defmodule Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF.SimplePolicyTest do
end
describe "when :reject_deletes is not empty but it doesn't have a matching host" do
- setup do: Config.put([:mrf_simple, :reject_deletes], ["non.matching.remote"])
+ setup do: Config.put([:mrf_simple, :reject_deletes], [{"non.matching.remote", ""}])
test "it accepts deletions even from rejected servers" do
- Config.put([:mrf_simple, :reject], ["remote.instance"])
+ Config.put([:mrf_simple, :reject], [{"remote.instance", ""}])
deletion_message = build_remote_deletion_message()
@@ -475,7 +480,7 @@ defmodule Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF.SimplePolicyTest do
end
test "it accepts deletions even from non-whitelisted servers" do
- Config.put([:mrf_simple, :accept], ["non.matching.remote"])
+ Config.put([:mrf_simple, :accept], [{"non.matching.remote", ""}])
deletion_message = build_remote_deletion_message()
@@ -484,7 +489,7 @@ defmodule Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF.SimplePolicyTest do
end
describe "when :reject_deletes has a matching host" do
- setup do: Config.put([:mrf_simple, :reject_deletes], ["remote.instance"])
+ setup do: Config.put([:mrf_simple, :reject_deletes], [{"remote.instance", ""}])
test "it rejects the deletion" do
deletion_message = build_remote_deletion_message()
@@ -494,7 +499,7 @@ defmodule Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF.SimplePolicyTest do
end
describe "when :reject_deletes match with wildcard domain" do
- setup do: Config.put([:mrf_simple, :reject_deletes], ["*.remote.instance"])
+ setup do: Config.put([:mrf_simple, :reject_deletes], [{"*.remote.instance", ""}])
test "it rejects the deletion" do
deletion_message = build_remote_deletion_message()
diff --git a/test/pleroma/web/activity_pub/mrf_test.exs b/test/pleroma/web/activity_pub/mrf_test.exs
index 44a9cf086..d207e83bd 100644
--- a/test/pleroma/web/activity_pub/mrf_test.exs
+++ b/test/pleroma/web/activity_pub/mrf_test.exs
@@ -63,6 +63,15 @@ defmodule Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRFTest do
end
end
+ describe "instance_list_from_tuples/1" do
+ test "returns a list of instances from a list of {instance, reason} tuples" do
+ list = [{"some.tld", "a reason"}, {"other.tld", "another reason"}]
+ expected = ["some.tld", "other.tld"]
+
+ assert MRF.instance_list_from_tuples(list) == expected
+ end
+ end
+
describe "describe/0" do
test "it works as expected with noop policy" do
clear_config([:mrf, :policies], [Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF.NoOpPolicy])
diff --git a/test/pleroma/web/activity_pub/publisher_test.exs b/test/pleroma/web/activity_pub/publisher_test.exs
index 6d15e1640..8529911ca 100644
--- a/test/pleroma/web/activity_pub/publisher_test.exs
+++ b/test/pleroma/web/activity_pub/publisher_test.exs
@@ -267,6 +267,80 @@ defmodule Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.PublisherTest do
end
describe "publish/2" do
+ test_with_mock "doesn't publish a non-public activity to quarantined instances.",
+ Pleroma.Web.Federator.Publisher,
+ [:passthrough],
+ [] do
+ Config.put([:instance, :quarantined_instances], [{"domain.com", "some reason"}])
+
+ follower =
+ insert(:user, %{
+ local: false,
+ inbox: "https://domain.com/users/nick1/inbox",
+ ap_enabled: true
+ })
+
+ actor = insert(:user, follower_address: follower.ap_id)
+
+ {:ok, follower, actor} = Pleroma.User.follow(follower, actor)
+ actor = refresh_record(actor)
+
+ note_activity =
+ insert(:followers_only_note_activity,
+ user: actor,
+ recipients: [follower.ap_id]
+ )
+
+ res = Publisher.publish(actor, note_activity)
+
+ assert res == :ok
+
+ assert not called(
+ Pleroma.Web.Federator.Publisher.enqueue_one(Publisher, %{
+ inbox: "https://domain.com/users/nick1/inbox",
+ actor_id: actor.id,
+ id: note_activity.data["id"]
+ })
+ )
+ end
+
+ test_with_mock "Publishes a non-public activity to non-quarantined instances.",
+ Pleroma.Web.Federator.Publisher,
+ [:passthrough],
+ [] do
+ Config.put([:instance, :quarantined_instances], [{"somedomain.com", "some reason"}])
+
+ follower =
+ insert(:user, %{
+ local: false,
+ inbox: "https://domain.com/users/nick1/inbox",
+ ap_enabled: true
+ })
+
+ actor = insert(:user, follower_address: follower.ap_id)
+
+ {:ok, follower, actor} = Pleroma.User.follow(follower, actor)
+ actor = refresh_record(actor)
+
+ note_activity =
+ insert(:followers_only_note_activity,
+ user: actor,
+ recipients: [follower.ap_id]
+ )
+
+ res = Publisher.publish(actor, note_activity)
+
+ assert res == :ok
+
+ assert called(
+ Pleroma.Web.Federator.Publisher.enqueue_one(Publisher, %{
+ inbox: "https://domain.com/users/nick1/inbox",
+ actor_id: actor.id,
+ id: note_activity.data["id"]
+ })
+ )
+ end
+
test_with_mock "publishes an activity with BCC to all relevant peers.",
Pleroma.Web.Federator.Publisher,
[:passthrough],
diff --git a/test/pleroma/web/node_info_test.exs b/test/pleroma/web/node_info_test.exs
index 06b33607f..b2523119b 100644
--- a/test/pleroma/web/node_info_test.exs
+++ b/test/pleroma/web/node_info_test.exs
@@ -152,37 +152,127 @@ defmodule Pleroma.Web.NodeInfoTest do
)
end
- test "it shows MRF transparency data if enabled", %{conn: conn} do
- clear_config([:mrf, :policies], [Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF.SimplePolicy])
- clear_config([:mrf, :transparency], true)
+ describe "Quarantined instances" do
+ setup do
+ clear_config([:mrf, :transparency], true)
+ quarantined_instances = [{"example.com", "reason to quarantine"}]
+ clear_config([:instance, :quarantined_instances], quarantined_instances)
+ end
- simple_config = %{"reject" => ["example.com"]}
- clear_config(:mrf_simple, simple_config)
+ test "shows quarantined instances data if enabled", %{conn: conn} do
+ expected_config = ["example.com"]
- response =
- conn
- |> get("/nodeinfo/2.1.json")
- |> json_response(:ok)
+ response =
+ conn
+ |> get("/nodeinfo/2.1.json")
+ |> json_response(:ok)
+
+ assert response["metadata"]["federation"]["quarantined_instances"] == expected_config
+ end
+
+ test "shows extra information in the quarantined_info field for relevant entries", %{
+ conn: conn
+ } do
+ clear_config([:mrf, :transparency], true)
- assert response["metadata"]["federation"]["mrf_simple"] == simple_config
+ expected_config = %{
+ "quarantined_instances" => %{
+ "example.com" => %{"reason" => "reason to quarantine"}
+ }
+ }
+
+ response =
+ conn
+ |> get("/nodeinfo/2.1.json")
+ |> json_response(:ok)
+
+ assert response["metadata"]["federation"]["quarantined_instances_info"] == expected_config
+ end
end
- test "it performs exclusions from MRF transparency data if configured", %{conn: conn} do
- clear_config([:mrf, :policies], [Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF.SimplePolicy])
- clear_config([:mrf, :transparency], true)
- clear_config([:mrf, :transparency_exclusions], ["other.site"])
+ describe "MRF SimplePolicy" do
+ setup do
+ clear_config([:mrf, :policies], [Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.MRF.SimplePolicy])
+ clear_config([:mrf, :transparency], true)
+ end
- simple_config = %{"reject" => ["example.com", "other.site"]}
- clear_config(:mrf_simple, simple_config)
+ test "shows MRF transparency data if enabled", %{conn: conn} do
+ simple_config = %{"reject" => [{"example.com", ""}]}
+ clear_config(:mrf_simple, simple_config)
- expected_config = %{"reject" => ["example.com"]}
+ expected_config = %{"reject" => ["example.com"]}
- response =
- conn
- |> get("/nodeinfo/2.1.json")
- |> json_response(:ok)
+ response =
+ conn
+ |> get("/nodeinfo/2.1.json")
+ |> json_response(:ok)
+
+ assert response["metadata"]["federation"]["mrf_simple"] == expected_config
+ end
- assert response["metadata"]["federation"]["mrf_simple"] == expected_config
- assert response["metadata"]["federation"]["exclusions"] == true
+ test "performs exclusions from MRF transparency data if configured", %{conn: conn} do
+ clear_config([:mrf, :transparency_exclusions], [
+ {"other.site", "We don't want them to know"}
+ ])
+
+ simple_config = %{"reject" => [{"example.com", ""}, {"other.site", ""}]}
+ clear_config(:mrf_simple, simple_config)
+
+ expected_config = %{"reject" => ["example.com"]}
+
+ response =
+ conn
+ |> get("/nodeinfo/2.1.json")
+ |> json_response(:ok)
+
+ assert response["metadata"]["federation"]["mrf_simple"] == expected_config
+ assert response["metadata"]["federation"]["exclusions"] == true
+ end
+
+ test "shows extra information in the mrf_simple_info field for relevant entries", %{
+ conn: conn
+ } do
+ simple_config = %{
+ media_removal: [{"no.media", "LEEWWWDD >//<"}],
+ media_nsfw: [],
+ federated_timeline_removal: [{"no.ftl", ""}],
+ report_removal: [],
+ reject: [
+ {"example.instance", "Some reason"},
+ {"uwu.owo", "awoo to much"},
+ {"no.reason", ""}
+ ],
+ followers_only: [],
+ accept: [],
+ avatar_removal: [],
+ banner_removal: [],
+ reject_deletes: [
+ {"peak.me", "I want to peak at what they don't want me to see, eheh"}
+ ]
+ }
+
+ clear_config(:mrf_simple, simple_config)
+
+ clear_config([:mrf, :transparency_exclusions], [
+ {"peak.me", "I don't want them to know"}
+ ])
+
+ expected_config = %{
+ "media_removal" => %{
+ "no.media" => %{"reason" => "LEEWWWDD >//<"}
+ },
+ "reject" => %{
+ "example.instance" => %{"reason" => "Some reason"},
+ "uwu.owo" => %{"reason" => "awoo to much"}
+ }
+ }
+
+ response =
+ conn
+ |> get("/nodeinfo/2.1.json")
+ |> json_response(:ok)
+
+ assert response["metadata"]["federation"]["mrf_simple_info"] == expected_config
+ end
end
end
diff --git a/test/support/factory.ex b/test/support/factory.ex
index e02acb89b..786d12c4b 100644
--- a/test/support/factory.ex
+++ b/test/support/factory.ex
@@ -104,6 +104,11 @@ defmodule Pleroma.Factory do
}
end
+ def followers_only_note_factory(attrs \\ %{}) do
+ %Pleroma.Object{data: data} = note_factory(attrs)
+ %Pleroma.Object{data: Map.merge(data, %{"to" => [data["actor"] <> "/followers"]})}
+ end
+
def audio_factory(attrs \\ %{}) do
text = sequence(:text, &"lain radio episode #{&1}")
@@ -190,6 +195,33 @@ defmodule Pleroma.Factory do
}
end
+ def followers_only_note_activity_factory(attrs \\ %{}) do
+ user = attrs[:user] || insert(:user)
+ note = insert(:followers_only_note, user: user)
+
+ data_attrs = attrs[:data_attrs] || %{}
+ attrs = Map.drop(attrs, [:user, :note, :data_attrs])
+
+ data =
+ %{
+ "id" => Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.Utils.generate_activity_id(),
+ "type" => "Create",
+ "actor" => note.data["actor"],
+ "to" => note.data["to"],
+ "object" => note.data,
+ "published" => DateTime.utc_now() |> DateTime.to_iso8601(),
+ "context" => note.data["context"]
+ }
+ |> Map.merge(data_attrs)
+
+ %Pleroma.Activity{
+ data: data,
+ actor: data["actor"],
+ recipients: data["to"]
+ }
+ |> Map.merge(attrs)
+ end
+
def note_activity_factory(attrs \\ %{}) do
user = attrs[:user] || insert(:user)
note = attrs[:note] || insert(:note, user: user)