| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
There were async calls happening, so they weren't always finished when assert happened.
|
|
application does not depend on :logger"
During compilation, we had the following warning which is now fixed
```
==> restarter
Compiling 1 file (.ex)
warning: Logger.__do_log__/4 defined in application :logger is used by the current application but the current application does not depend on :logger. To fix this, you must do one of:
1. If :logger is part of Erlang/Elixir, you must include it under :extra_applications inside "def application" in your mix.exs
2. If :logger is a dependency, make sure it is listed under "def deps" in your mix.exs
3. In case you don't want to add a requirement to :logger, you may optionally skip this warning by adding [xref: [exclude: [Logger]]] to your "def project" in mix.exs
Invalid call found at 2 locations:
lib/pleroma.ex:65: Restarter.Pleroma.handle_cast/2
lib/pleroma.ex:78: Restarter.Pleroma.handle_cast/2
warning: Logger.__should_log__/2 defined in application :logger is used by the current application but the current application does not depend on :logger. To fix this, you must do one of:
1. If :logger is part of Erlang/Elixir, you must include it under :extra_applications inside "def application" in your mix.exs
2. If :logger is a dependency, make sure it is listed under "def deps" in your mix.exs
3. In case you don't want to add a requirement to :logger, you may optionally skip this warning by adding [xref: [exclude: [Logger]]] to your "def project" in mix.exs
Invalid call found at 2 locations:
lib/pleroma.ex:65: Restarter.Pleroma.handle_cast/2
lib/pleroma.ex:78: Restarter.Pleroma.handle_cast/2
warning: Logger.debug/1 defined in application :logger is used by the current application but the current application does not depend on :logger. To fix this, you must do one of:
1. If :logger is part of Erlang/Elixir, you must include it under :extra_applications inside "def application" in your mix.exs
2. If :logger is a dependency, make sure it is listed under "def deps" in your mix.exs
3. In case you don't want to add a requirement to :logger, you may optionally skip this warning by adding [xref: [exclude: [Logger]]] to your "def project" in mix.exs
Invalid call found at 2 locations:
lib/pleroma.ex:65: Restarter.Pleroma.handle_cast/2
lib/pleroma.ex:78: Restarter.Pleroma.handle_cast/2
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: marcin mikołajczak <git@mkljczk.pl>
|
|
Shrink CI
See merge request pleroma/pleroma!3691
|
|
Translatable config descriptions
Closes pleroma-meta#65
See merge request pleroma/pleroma!3695
|
|
|
|
MastoAPI: Use `types` for filtering notifications
See merge request pleroma/pleroma!3648
|
|
DOCS: Add some small piece about setting up a Gitlab-runner
See merge request pleroma/pleroma!3694
|
|
Signed-off-by: marcin mikołajczak <git@mkljczk.pl>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This was done by floatingghost as part of a bigger commit in Akkoma.
See <https://akkoma.dev/AkkomaGang/akkoma/src/commit/37ae047e1652c4089934434ec79f393c4c839122/lib/pleroma/application.ex#L83>.
As explained in <https://ihatebeinga.live/objects/860d23e1-dc64-4b07-8b4d-020b9c56cff6>
> there are so many caches that clearing them all can nuke the supervisor, which by default will become an hero if it gets more than 3 restarts in <5 seconds
And further down the thread
> essentially we've got like 11 caches (https://akkoma.dev/AkkomaGang/akkoma/src/commit/37ae047e1652c4089934434ec79f393c4c839122/lib/pleroma/application.ex#L165)
> then in test we fetch them all (https://akkoma.dev/AkkomaGang/akkoma/src/branch/develop/test/support/data_case.ex#L50) and call clear on them
> so if this clear fails on any 3 of them, the pleroma supervisor itself will die
How it fails?
> idk maybe cachex dies, maybe :ets does a weird thing
> it doesn't log anything, it just consistently dies during cache clearing so i figured it had to be that
> honestly my best bet is locksmith and queuing
> https://github.com/whitfin/cachex/blob/master/lib/cachex/actions/clear.ex#L26
> clear is thrown into a locksmith transaction
> locksmith says
> >If the process is already in a transactional context, the provided function will be executed immediately. Otherwise the required keys will be locked until the provided function has finished executing.
> so if we get 2 clears too close together, maybe it locks, then doesn't like the next clear?
|
|
Translate static_pages.po (Simplified Chinese)
See merge request pleroma/pleroma!3655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: marcin mikołajczak <git@mkljczk.pl>
|
|
This is based on me setting one up, but I kept it general with mostly linking to other documentation.
The idea is that to just provide some Pleroma-specific info, maybe give some pointers, and point to the right (external) docs.
|
|
Add short_description instance field
Closes #2865
See merge request pleroma/pleroma!3651
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
into 'develop'
Make checking blacklisted domains and restricted nicknames case-insensitive
Closes #2894 and #2888
See merge request pleroma/pleroma!3687
|
|
|
|
Pass remote follow avatar into media proxy
Closes #2830
See merge request pleroma/pleroma!3690
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It used a timer to sleep.
But time also goes on when doing other things, so depending on hardware, the timings could be off.
I slightly changed the tests so we still test what we functionally want.
Instead of waiting until the cache expires I now have a function to expire the test and use that.
That means we're not testing any more if the cache really expires after a certain amount of time,
but that's the responsability of the dependency imo, so shouldn't be a problem.
I also changed `Pleroma.Web.Endpoint, :http, :ip` to `127.0.0.1` because that's the setting people typically have,
and I see no reason to do it differently.
Especially since it's an exernal ip, which may come over as weird or suspicious to people.
|
|
Signed-off-by: marcin mikołajczak <git@mkljczk.pl>
|
|
|
|
It is possible for an earlier Update to be received by us later.
For this, we now
(1) only allows Updates to poll counts if there is no updated field,
or the updated field is the same as the last updated date or
creation date;
(2) does not allow updating anything if the updated field
is older than the last updated date or creation date;
(3) allows updating updatable fields otherwise (normal updates);
(4) if only the updated field is changed, it does not create
a new history item on its own.
|
|
do restricted nickname validation in LDAP account registration
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fix long report notes giving errors on creation
See merge request pleroma/pleroma!3679
|
|
These changes make the encoding for the fully-qualified heart emoji very visible in editors.
|
|
In Create validator we do not validate the object data,
but that is because the object itself will go through the
pipeline again, which is not the case for Update. Thus,
we added validation for objects in Update activities.
|
|
|
|
# Conflicts:
# lib/pleroma/constants.ex
|
|
mix: update eblurhash to 1.2.2
See merge request pleroma/pleroma!3686
|
