diff options
| author | Hélène <pleroma-dev@helene.moe> | 2022-08-19 02:45:49 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Hélène <pleroma-dev@helene.moe> | 2022-08-19 02:45:49 +0200 |
| commit | 4661b56720b4f70eb6996bf975c4d88db9828006 (patch) | |
| tree | 4193d36e3242349aefc47958afd3579da41d306e /lib/pleroma | |
| parent | 61254111e59f02118cad15de49d1e0704c07030e (diff) | |
| download | pleroma-4661b56720b4f70eb6996bf975c4d88db9828006.tar.gz | |
ArticleNotePageValidator: fix replies fixing
Some software, like GoToSocial, expose replies as ActivityPub
Collections, but do not expose any item array directly in the object,
causing validation to fail via the ObjectID validator. Now, Pleroma will
drop that field in this situation too.
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/pleroma')
| -rw-r--r-- | lib/pleroma/web/activity_pub/object_validators/article_note_page_validator.ex | 5 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/lib/pleroma/web/activity_pub/object_validators/article_note_page_validator.ex b/lib/pleroma/web/activity_pub/object_validators/article_note_page_validator.ex index 57c8d1dc0..4243e0fbf 100644 --- a/lib/pleroma/web/activity_pub/object_validators/article_note_page_validator.ex +++ b/lib/pleroma/web/activity_pub/object_validators/article_note_page_validator.ex @@ -60,7 +60,10 @@ defmodule Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.ObjectValidators.ArticleNotePageValidator do defp fix_replies(%{"replies" => %{"items" => replies}} = data) when is_list(replies), do: Map.put(data, "replies", replies) - defp fix_replies(%{"replies" => replies} = data) when is_bitstring(replies), + # TODO: Pleroma does not have any support for Collections at the moment. + # If the `replies` field is not something the ObjectID validator can handle, + # the activity/object would be rejected, which is bad behavior. + defp fix_replies(%{"replies" => replies} = data) when not is_list(replies), do: Map.drop(data, ["replies"]) defp fix_replies(data), do: data |